Big Society

What is the Big Society?

'Big Society' is the vision promoted by David Cameron during and after the 2010 General Election campaign.

The Big Society David Cameron (November 2009)
Building the Big Society Coalition Government programme (May 2010)

The Big Society is not a policy programme in the traditional sense. It's more like an outcome, or category of outcomes, that will be assessed at some future time according to the successful - or otherwise - implementation of three strands outlined by the Prime Minister on 19 July 2010:

a new culture of voluntarism, philanthropy, social action, or 'what we can do for each other'
public service reform - getting rid of centralised bureaucracy that wastes money and undermines morale, and open up public services to new providers like charities, social enterprises and private companies, or 'what the government can do for us'
community empowerment - neighbourhoods taking charge of their own destiny, who feel if they club together and get involved they can shape the world around them, or 'what we can do for ourselves'

A wide range of organisations and individuals have taken part in the discussion and debate around what 'Big Society' means, what it might look like in practice and how it might be delivered.

Big Society Consultation Insitute briefings
Big Society bite sized Urban Forum (August 2010)
Big Society - the evidence base NCVO (July 2010)
Civic Streets: the Big Society in action Demos (June 2010)
Interviews with Lord Wei, former Government advisor on Big Society
- The Guardian (18 June 2010)
- The Guardian (22 June 2010)
Big Society - challenges and opportunities NCVO (May 2010)
The Big Society: How it Could Work PACES (May 2010)
Ten Big Questions about the Big Society: and ten ways to make the best of it New Economics Foundation (January 2010)

Big Society and public spending cuts

Arguably the greatest challenge faced by the government around Big Society is to convince people that it can be established and developed when the government is simutaneously making big cuts in its spending on local government and public services.

The Local Government Finance Settlement 2011-2013 House of Commons briefing (February 2011)

It has been widely argued that government cuts to it annual local government grants, the 'finance settlement', have disproportionately targeted poorer local authority areas that have a relatively higher dependence on the local public sector for income and employment.

Spending Review response Special Interest Group of Municipal Authorities (October 2010)
Post spending Review briefing Institute for Fiscal Studies (October 2010)

Some local authorities had previously used specific central government grants such as Area Based Grant, Performance Reward Grant and Working Neighbourhoods Fund to replace significant elements of mainstream civil society grants programmes, particularly for local support and development organisations.

As these funding streams havebeen withdrawn by central government, many local authorities have simply passed on the reductions to local voluntary and community organisations.

The new Best Value Statutory Guidance sets out "reasonable expectations" of the way authorities should work with voluntary and community groups and small businesses when facing difficult funding decisions, particularly requiring local councils not to cut their local voluntary and community sector disproportionately.

Cutting It: The 'Big Society' and the new austerity New Economics Foundation (November 2010)
Big Society, Cuts and Consequences Centre for Charity Effectiveness, Cass Business School (November 2010)

Localism

The overarching policy by which the government intends to see Big Society delivered is 'localism'.

Although there is no universally accepted definition of localism, it is widely understood as meaning the devolution of decision making power to the most local level at which it can operate. In matters of national policy such power will remain with central government, but wherever possible it should be given to regions, local authority areas, neighbourhoods and communities and even individuals.

Although most of the rhetoric has been around local geographical areas and neighbourhoods, or communities of place, reference has been made to communities of identity, interest, need etc., or what Greg Clark, Minister for Decentralisation, has called "causal" or "virtual" communities.

Fundamental to the government's policy agenda is the Localism Bill, announced in the Queen's Speech and introduced by Eric Pickles, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government in December, which is now in its Committee Stage in the House of Lords.

This Bill is intended to

deliver new powers for councils - a transfer of power from Whitehall will free councils to act in the best interests of their area through, among other measures, a 'general power of competence'. There will be new directly elected mayors in the 12 major English cities and any others who want one

deliver new rights for local people and communities - local people and communities' will have real power in their areas through a new right to challenge service delivery, a right to buy community assets such as libraries, pubs and shops and a right to veto excessive council tax rises. Minister for decentralisation Greg Clark has given assurances that the government's definition of communities is not limited to communities 'of place' but includes what he calls 'virtual' and 'causal' communities - those non-geographic communities of identity, of need, of interest with which we're very familiar.

reform planning - restore democratic and local control over planning; neighbourhood plans will become the new building blocks of the planning system where communities have the power to grant planning permission if a local majority are in favour

make housing fairer and more democratic - return decision-making powers on housing to local councils and communities; put councils in charge of allocation and tenure of social housing, giving councils the flexibility to use their social housing stock to the maximum effect and reduce waiting lists. The Tenant Services Authority will be abolished but its vital economic regulation functions will be preserved

create incentives for economic growth - give local government a stronger financial stake in the local economy, so it is more entrepreneurial and attracts local business by allowing local authorities to grant discretionary business rate discounts; making small business tax breaks easier to take advantage of; giving affected businesses a greater say in rate supplements.

Central to the government's localism agenda is the Localism Bill, announced in the Queen's Speech and introduced by Eric Pickles, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, in December 2011.

In response to the Localism Bill, NAVCA and our partner organisations have developed the Real Power for Communities campaign, to champion the proposed new rights of local communities and ensure that the localisation of powers doesn't stop at local authority level.

Whose Localism? Centre for Charity Effectiveness, Cass Business School (September 2011)
Real Power for Communities NAVCA briefing (May 2011)
Questions for Localism Sir Michael Lyons (January 2011)

Big Society initiatives

The government has developed and launched a wide range of initiatives relating to Big Society.

Some have to do with philanthropy and giving, and with ways of financing new and existing charities, voluntary and community groups, social enterprises and mutuals.

Big Society Bank

Big Society Bank - Glossary of terms (May 2011)
Big Society Bank - NAVCA briefing (May 2011)

Others are concerned with encouraging volunteering and social action in communities:

Big Society Network

Still other are concerned with 'barrier busting', removing 'red tape' obstacles to local decision making and developing ways for people to become more involved in local decision making:

Supporting a Stronger Civil Society - government consultation
Big Society vanguards

Big Society Survey

As the Government's plans for the Big Society began to take shape, NAVCA surveyed our members to gauge their understanding of the idea, and their expectations and reservations about the proposals.